Ryzen 7 7800X vs EPYC 7702

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking45not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency20.87no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen 4
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB512 KB
L2 cache32 MB8 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)96 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm271+122 mm
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7702 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7702 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X
Ryzen 7 7800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 29 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 113 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or Ryzen 7 7800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.