Ryzen 3 8300G vs EPYC 7663P

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date5 September 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,139$176

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million20,900 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12814

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 56 4
Threads 112 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7663P has 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 269.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7663P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7663P and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7663P
EPYC 7663P
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7663P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7663P or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.