Ryzen 7 5800HS vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
47.24
+260%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800HS by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency19.1434.16
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier2028
L1 cache4 MB512 KB
L2 cache32 MB4 MB
L3 cache256 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 47.24
+260%
Ryzen 7 5800HS 13.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7662 72298
+260%
Ryzen 7 5800HS 20066

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.24 13.11
Recency 19 February 2020 12 January 2021
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7662 has a 260.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 7 5800HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5800HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5800HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
Ryzen 7 5800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 253 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Ryzen 7 5800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.