EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+14.6%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7662 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.08
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency19.1421.93
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier2020
L1 cache4 MB4 MB
L2 cache32 MB32 MB
L3 cache256 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 45.51
EPYC 7713 52.14
+14.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7662 72298
EPYC 7713 82825
+14.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.51 52.14
Recency 19 February 2020 12 January 2021

EPYC 7713 has a 14.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7662 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.