Processor 300T vs EPYC 7643P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 36 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 20.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 5 September 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,722 | $82 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 September 2023 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 2 |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 7643P has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 542.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7643P is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643P and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
