EPYC 9375F vs EPYC 7643P

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.45no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency20.47no data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date5 September 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,722$5,306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads9664
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million66,520 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 48 32
Threads 96 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 7643P has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 42.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7643P or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.