EPYC 4244P vs EPYC 7643

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7643
2021
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
47.88
+177%
EPYC 4244P
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.31

EPYC 7643 outperforms EPYC 4244P by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking38368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.7156.10
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency20.1425.20
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,995$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4244P has 736% better value for money than EPYC 7643.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads9612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7643 47.88
+177%
EPYC 4244P 17.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7643 76050
+177%
EPYC 4244P 27492

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.88 17.31
Recency 12 January 2021 21 May 2024
Physical cores 48 6
Threads 96 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7643 has a 176.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7643 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4244P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643 and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7643
EPYC 7643
AMD EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 232 votes

Rate EPYC 7643 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4244P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7643 or EPYC 4244P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.