EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 7642

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
37.01
+16.2%
EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
31.84

EPYC 7642 outperforms EPYC 7453 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking91128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2616.50
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.5713.39
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775$1,570

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7453 has 214% better value for money than EPYC 7642.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads9656
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.45 GHz
Multiplier2327.5
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 37.01
+16.2%
EPYC 7453 31.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+16.3%
EPYC 7453 50575

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.01 31.84
Recency 7 August 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 48 28
Threads 96 56

EPYC 7642 has a 16.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

EPYC 7453, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7453 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7453, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or EPYC 7453, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.