7 150UL vs EPYC 7642

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking90not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.57no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads9612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache3 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR41700
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 8 April 2024
Physical cores 48 10
Threads 96 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7642 has 380% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

7 150UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 150UL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and Core 7 150UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
Intel Core 7 150UL
Core 7 150UL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 150UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or Core 7 150UL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.