Atom x7433RE vs EPYC 7642

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
38.42
+1302%

EPYC 7642 outperforms Atom x7433RE by a whopping 1302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking901708
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.5727.76
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads964
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache3 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 38.42
+1302%
Atom x7433RE 2.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+1302%
Atom x7433RE 4194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.42 2.74
Recency 7 August 2019 8 April 2024
Physical cores 48 4
Threads 96 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 9 Watt

EPYC 7642 has a 1302.2% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x7433RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 2400% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7433RE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7433RE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and Atom x7433RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
Intel Atom x7433RE
Atom x7433RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7433RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or Atom x7433RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.