Ryzen 5 3400G vs EPYC 7601

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
20.94
+260%
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.82

EPYC 7601 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2651126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.61no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency11.018.47
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier2237
L1 cache3 MB384 KB
L2 cache16 MB2 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2210 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size2 TiB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 20.94
+260%
Ryzen 5 3400G 5.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 33255
+260%
Ryzen 5 3400G 9246

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7601 792
Ryzen 5 3400G 1136
+43.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7601 7699
+112%
Ryzen 5 3400G 3631

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.94 5.82
Recency 20 June 2017 12 June 2019
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7601 has a 259.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3400G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3400G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2153 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.