EPYC 8024P vs EPYC 7601

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
21.86
+65.7%
EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
13.19

EPYC 7601 outperforms EPYC 8024P by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking248583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6520.42
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.2813.61
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8024P has 1138% better value for money than EPYC 7601.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size213 mm273 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP6
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 21.86
+65.7%
EPYC 8024P 13.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 34079
+65.8%
EPYC 8024P 20556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.86 13.19
Recency 20 June 2017 18 September 2023
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7601 has a 65.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 24 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.