9 270H vs EPYC 7601

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking265not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.01no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)18 December 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$697

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads6420
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.8 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 18 December 2024
Physical cores 32 14
Threads 64 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7601 has 128.6% more physical cores and 220% more threads.

9 270H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation processor while Core 9 270H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Core 9 270H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
Intel Core 9 270H
Core 9 270H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 9 270H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or Core 9 270H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.