Celeron N4100 vs EPYC 7601

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
21.45
+1284%
Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.55

EPYC 7601 outperforms Celeron N4100 by a whopping 1284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2482117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Celeron
Power efficiency11.2824.45
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier2211
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 deg C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1286
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 21.45
+1284%
Celeron N4100 1.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 34079
+1287%
Celeron N4100 2457

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7601 792
+156%
Celeron N4100 309

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7601 7699
+833%
Celeron N4100 825

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.45 1.55
Recency 29 June 2017 11 December 2017
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7601 has a 1283.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Celeron N4100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 2900% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N4100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Celeron N4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 24 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 430 votes

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or Celeron N4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.