Xeon Gold 6430 vs EPYC 7573X
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 49 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 14.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,138 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 March 2022 | 10 January 2023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 270 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6430 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 3.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and Xeon Gold 6430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
