Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs EPYC 7573X
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 48 | 502 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 14.77 | 38.61 |
| Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 680M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 43.87 | 14.34 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 7573X has a 205.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
