Xeon Gold 6326 vs EPYC 7551

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
16.34
Xeon Gold 6326
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
22.20
+35.9%

Xeon Gold 6326 outperforms EPYC 7551 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking409238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.5911.36
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache3 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 16.34
Xeon Gold 6326 22.20
+35.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7551 25960
Xeon Gold 6326 35270
+35.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.34 22.20
Recency 20 June 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 7551 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 2.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has a 35.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6326 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.