Ryzen 9 9950X vs EPYC 7551

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
16.34
Ryzen 9 9950X
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
41.78
+156%

Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms EPYC 7551 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking40958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2765.16
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.5923.26
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 9950X has 5031% better value for money than EPYC 7551.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache3 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 16.34
Ryzen 9 9950X 41.78
+156%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7551 25960
Ryzen 9 9950X 66361
+156%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.34 41.78
Recency 20 June 2017 15 August 2024
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 170 Watt

EPYC 7551 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 9950X, on the other hand, has a 155.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 9950X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7551 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 9950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 9 9950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Ryzen 9 9950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 362 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or Ryzen 9 9950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.