Xeon W-3345 vs EPYC 7513

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+29.7%
Xeon W-3345
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
28.77

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon W-3345 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking83157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.23no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.6610.89
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache2 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345.

PCIe version4.04
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 37.32
+29.7%
Xeon W-3345 28.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7513 59285
+29.7%
Xeon W-3345 45694

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.32 28.77
Recency 12 January 2021 29 July 2021
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

EPYC 7513 has a 29.7% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3345, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3345 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Xeon W-3345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or Xeon W-3345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.