Processor N97 vs EPYC 7513
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7513 outperforms Processor N97 by a whopping 982% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7513 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 83 | 1539 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.66 | 27.20 |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,840 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7513 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.65 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 26 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7513 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7513 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Processor N97.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 38.74 | 3.58 |
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 12 Watt |
EPYC 7513 has a 982.1% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N97, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N97 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N97 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
