Opteron 6380 vs EPYC 7501

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7501
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 170 Watt
15.69
+273%
Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.21

EPYC 7501 outperforms Opteron 6380 by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4291373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.140.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.733.46
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)5 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$1,150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7501 has 93% better value for money than Opteron 6380.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketTR4G34
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7501 15.69
+273%
Opteron 6380 4.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7501 24925
+273%
Opteron 6380 6687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7501 726
+74.9%
Opteron 6380 415

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7501 6529
+104%
Opteron 6380 3208

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.69 4.21
Recency 29 June 2017 5 November 2012
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 115 Watt

EPYC 7501 has a 272.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6380, on the other hand, has 47.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7501 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7501 and Opteron 6380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7501
EPYC 7501
AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7501 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7501 or Opteron 6380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.