FX-7600P vs EPYC 7501

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7501
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 170 Watt
15.69
+863%
FX-7600P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.63

EPYC 7501 outperforms FX-7600P by a whopping 863% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4292081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency8.734.41
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno dataBGA (FP3)
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7501 15.69
+863%
FX-7600P 1.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7501 24925
+865%
FX-7600P 2582

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7501 726
+100%
FX-7600P 363

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7501 6529
+709%
FX-7600P 807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.69 1.63
Recency 29 June 2017 4 June 2014
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7501 has a 862.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-7600P, on the other hand, has 385.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7501 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7501 is a server/workstation processor while FX-7600P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7501 and FX-7600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7501
EPYC 7501
AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7501 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7501 or FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.