Xeon Gold 6150 vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
Xeon Gold 6150
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
16.86
+3.6%

Xeon Gold 6150 outperforms EPYC 7451 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking411390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.794.15
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.569.67
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400$3,358

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6150 has 132% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads4836
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2327
L1 cache2.25 MB1.125 MB
L2 cache12 MB18 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)24.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size2 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.28
Xeon Gold 6150 16.86
+3.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
Xeon Gold 6150 26789
+3.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 16.86
Recency 20 June 2017 25 April 2017
Physical cores 24 18
Threads 48 36
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 165 Watt

EPYC 7451 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6150, on the other hand, has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Xeon Gold 6150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Xeon Gold 6150
Xeon Gold 6150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Xeon Gold 6150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.