Ryzen 5 2600 vs EPYC 7451

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
+96.1%
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30

EPYC 7451 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking405903
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.729.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency8.5612.08
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 469% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2334
L1 cache2.25 MB576 KB
L2 cache12 MB3 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.28
+96.1%
Ryzen 5 2600 8.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
+96.1%
Ryzen 5 2600 13189

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 8.30
Recency 20 June 2017 13 April 2018
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 96.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14936 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.