Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs EPYC 7443P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443P
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.94
+127%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
15.82

EPYC 7443P outperforms Ryzen Z1 Extreme by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking102423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency17.0199.81
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,337no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.85 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier28.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7443P 35.94
+127%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 15.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7443P 57088
+127%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 25125

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7443P 1672
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 2195
+31.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7443P 14398
+48.6%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 9692

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.94 15.82
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7443P has a 127.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Z1 Extreme in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Z1 Extreme, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 444 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7443P or Ryzen Z1 Extreme, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.