EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 7443P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443P
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.86
EPYC 9354
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.96
+22.6%

EPYC 9354 outperforms EPYC 7443P by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.2110.45
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.9714.86
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,337$3,420

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7443P has 132% better value for money than EPYC 9354.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.85 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.25 GHz
Multiplier28.532.5
L1 cache1536 KB2 MB
L2 cache12 MB32 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7443P 35.86
EPYC 9354 43.96
+22.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7443P 56966
EPYC 9354 69825
+22.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7443P 1686
EPYC 9354 1779
+5.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7443P 14496
+12.5%
EPYC 9354 12881

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.86 43.96
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7443P has 40% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9354, on the other hand, has a 22.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9354 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7443P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7443P and EPYC 9354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P
AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7443P or EPYC 9354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.