Xeon D-2795NT vs EPYC 7401P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
18.65
+0.3%

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking335337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.99no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.0015.42
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads4840
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache2.25 MBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels84
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12832
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401P 18.65
+0.3%
Xeon D-2795NT 18.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401P 28546
+0.3%
Xeon D-2795NT 28463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.65 18.60
Recency 20 June 2017 1 January 2022
Physical cores 24 20
Threads 48 40
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 110 Watt

EPYC 7401P has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

Xeon D-2795NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 40.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401P and Xeon D-2795NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
Intel Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2795NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401P or Xeon D-2795NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.