Ryzen 7 3800X vs EPYC 7401P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
18.31
+23.3%
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
14.85

EPYC 7401P outperforms Ryzen 7 3800X by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking339488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.6515.50
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency10.0013.14
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 3800X has 233% better value for money than EPYC 7401P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache2.25 MB512 KB
L2 cache12 MB4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401P 18.31
+23.3%
Ryzen 7 3800X 14.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401P 28546
+23.4%
Ryzen 7 3800X 23141

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7401P 787
Ryzen 7 3800X 1701
+116%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7401P 4666
Ryzen 7 3800X 8218
+76.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.31 14.85
Recency 20 June 2017 27 May 2019
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7401P has a 23.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 7 3800X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 47.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7401P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3800X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 3800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 3800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1740 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401P or Ryzen 7 3800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.