i5-12600KF vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
35.74
+98.4%
Core i5-12600KF
2021
10 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
18.01

EPYC 7401 outperforms i5-12600KF by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking101345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.0448.92
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850$264

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12600KF has 387% better value for money than EPYC 7401.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2037
L1 cache2.25 MB384 KB
L2 cache12 MB9.5 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401 35.74
+98.4%
i5-12600KF 18.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
+98.4%
i5-12600KF 27861

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.74 18.01
Recency 20 June 2017 27 October 2021
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 98.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i5-12600KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 24% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-12600KF in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and Core i5-12600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Core i5-12600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1657 votes

Rate Core i5-12600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or Core i5-12600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.