Ryzen Threadripper 7970X vs EPYC 73F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.02
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
62.18
+114%

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X outperforms EPYC 73F3 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.6421.88
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.4416.81
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X has 230% better value for money than EPYC 73F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.02
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 62.18
+114%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 73F3 46103
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 98775
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.02 62.18
Recency 12 January 2021 19 October 2023
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 73F3 has 45.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, on the other hand, has a 114.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 73F3 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.