Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs EPYC 73F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.02
+3.8%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.97

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking152167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.64no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency11.3882.29
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.02 27.97
Recency 15 March 2021 30 October 2024
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 32 Watt

EPYC 73F3 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

Be aware that EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.