3 100HL vs EPYC 7373X
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 3.05 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | SP3 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 22 March 2022 | 8 April 2024 |
Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
Threads | 32 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 45 Watt |
EPYC 7373X has 100% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
3 100HL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 433.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation processor while Core 3 100HL is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7373X and Core 3 100HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.