Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs EPYC 7371

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
20.32
+50.7%
Xeon E5-2673 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
13.48

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v4 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking286574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.58no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.269.11
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads3240
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3123
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache8 MB5 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)50 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2456.12 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB1,536 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 20.32
+50.7%
Xeon E5-2673 v4 13.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 31094
+50.7%
Xeon E5-2673 v4 20631

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.32 13.48
Recency 13 November 2018 20 June 2016
Physical cores 16 20
Threads 32 40
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 135 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 50.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Xeon E5-2673 v4, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 48.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2673 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Xeon E5-2673 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
Xeon E5-2673 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 121 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2673 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Xeon E5-2673 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.