Celeron 3855U vs EPYC 7371

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
19.45
+2426%
Celeron 3855U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77

EPYC 7371 outperforms Celeron 3855U by a whopping 2426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2902634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.39no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Celeron
Power efficiency9.164.84
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplier3116
L1 cache1.5 MB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory size2 TiB32 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes12810

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 19.45
+2426%
Celeron 3855U 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 30782
+2425%
Celeron 3855U 1219

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.45 0.77
Recency 13 November 2018 15 August 2015
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 2426% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Celeron 3855U, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3855U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3855U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Celeron 3855U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 29 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Celeron 3855U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.