Xeon Platinum 8468H vs EPYC 7352
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 193 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.43 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.41 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,350 | $13,923 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 105 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 8 |
| Socket | TR4 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 48 |
| Threads | 48 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 330 Watt |
EPYC 7352 has 112.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8468H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Platinum 8468H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
