Opteron 6274 vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.15
+355%
Opteron 6274
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.55

EPYC 7351P outperforms Opteron 6274 by a whopping 355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4091515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.500.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.992.92
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)14 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750$909

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7351P has 882% better value for money than Opteron 6274.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96K (per core)768 KB (shared)
L2 cache512K (per core)8.00391 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2316 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4G34
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.15
+355%
Opteron 6274 3.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+355%
Opteron 6274 5643

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.15 3.55
Recency 29 June 2017 14 November 2011
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 115 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 354.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6274, on the other hand, has 47.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6274 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Opteron 6274, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD Opteron 6274
Opteron 6274

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Opteron 6274 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or Opteron 6274, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.