Celeron N5105 vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
16.59
+533%

EPYC 7351P outperforms Celeron N5105 by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3881701
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.20no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache8 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB16 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes1288
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.59
+533%
Celeron N5105 2.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+533%
Celeron N5105 4056

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7351P 630
+33.8%
Celeron N5105 471

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7351P 4738
+271%
Celeron N5105 1278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.59 2.62
Recency 20 June 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 10 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 533.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1450% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 657 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.