C-60 vs EPYC 7351P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7351P and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 406 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.62 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD C-Series |
| Power efficiency | 9.00 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $750 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7351P and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7351P and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and C-60 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR3 Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and C-60.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2017 | 22 August 2011 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 7351P has an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
C-60, on the other hand, has 1622.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7351P and C-60. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while C-60 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
