Xeon W-1390 vs EPYC 7351

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
14.62
Xeon W-1390
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
15.05
+2.9%

Xeon W-1390 outperforms EPYC 7351 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking489470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2164.71
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.1417.80
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,100$494

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1390 has 1916% better value for money than EPYC 7351.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351 14.62
Xeon W-1390 15.05
+2.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351 23226
Xeon W-1390 23902
+2.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.62 15.05
Recency 20 June 2017 6 May 2021
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 80 Watt

EPYC 7351 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon W-1390, on the other hand, has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 93.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351 and Xeon W-1390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351
EPYC 7351
Intel Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7351 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351 or Xeon W-1390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.