Ultra 9 288V vs EPYC 7343

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
27.42
+119%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking178623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.6539.47
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,565no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiB32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1284
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7343 27.42
+119%
Ultra 9 288V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7343 43561
+119%
Ultra 9 288V 19895

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.42 12.52
Recency 15 March 2021 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 30 Watt

EPYC 7343 has a 119% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7343 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7343 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.