EPYC 7543P vs EPYC 7313P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
26.19
EPYC 7543P
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
41.98
+60.3%

EPYC 7543P outperforms EPYC 7313P by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18955
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.2913.27
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.9917.66
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$913$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313P has 68% better value for money than EPYC 7543P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3028
L1 cache1 MB2 MB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm+
Die size4x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313P 26.19
EPYC 7543P 41.98
+60.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313P 41609
EPYC 7543P 66687
+60.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.19 41.98
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7313P has 45.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543P, on the other hand, has a 60.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7313P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7543P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P
AMD EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7543P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313P or EPYC 7543P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.