Ryzen 7 7730U vs EPYC 7313

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
+110%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking200657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.31no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.0373.98
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors16,600 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 25.54
+110%
Ryzen 7 7730U 12.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313 39091
+110%
Ryzen 7 7730U 18629

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7313 1487
Ryzen 7 7730U 1647
+10.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7313 11432
+79.2%
Ryzen 7 7730U 6381

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.54 12.17
Recency 12 January 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 109.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7730U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7730U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7730U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 7 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 972 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Ryzen 7 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.