Processor N95 vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.61
+674%
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.18

EPYC 7313 outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2071616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.19no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency15.0320.06
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7313 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Processor N95.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.61 3.18
Recency 12 January 2021 3 January 2023
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 673.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 717 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.