Xeon Platinum 8351N vs EPYC 7302P

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking266not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.67no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.54no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)36
Threads3272
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)54 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7302P 1192
Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617
+35.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7302P 8185
Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233
+86.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 36
Threads 32 72
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 45.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8351N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8351N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Xeon Platinum 8351N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.