Processor 300 vs EPYC 7302P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.57
+356%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

EPYC 7302P outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2671309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.86no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.569.28
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 20.57
+356%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302P 32669
+356%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.57 4.51
Recency 7 August 2019 8 January 2024
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 4
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 46 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 356.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 237% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.