Ultra 9 285K vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.57
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.07
+109%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms EPYC 7302P by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.4074.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.5632.61
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 455% better value for money than EPYC 7302P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 20.57
Ultra 9 285K 43.07
+109%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302P 32669
Ultra 9 285K 68422
+109%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.57 43.07
Recency 7 August 2019 24 October 2024
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7302P has 33.3% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 109.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7302P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 167 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.