Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.96
+606%
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.97

EPYC 7302P outperforms Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE by a whopping 606% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2671650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.95no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.567.88
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Dali (2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 20.96
+606%
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE 2.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302P 32669
+605%
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE 4633

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.96 2.97
Recency 7 August 2019 21 July 2020
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7302P has a 605.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.