Xeon Gold 5415+ vs EPYC 7302

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.63
+32.7%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Xeon Gold 5415+ by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking257425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.8034.44
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.729.91
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$978$1,076

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5415+ has 192% better value for money than EPYC 7302.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR44677
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302 21.63
+32.7%
Xeon Gold 5415+ 16.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302 33106
+32.7%
Xeon Gold 5415+ 24951

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.63 16.30
Recency 7 August 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7302 has a 32.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 5415+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 3.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5415+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302 and Xeon Gold 5415+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5415 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302 or Xeon Gold 5415+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.