Ryzen 9 5900H vs EPYC 7302

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
20.84
+61.1%
Ryzen 9 5900H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.94

EPYC 7302 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900H by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking267591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.52no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency12.7227.21
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)7 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$978no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302 20.84
+61.1%
Ryzen 9 5900H 12.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302 33106
+61%
Ryzen 9 5900H 20557

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.84 12.94
Recency 7 August 2019 7 January 2021
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7302 has a 61.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 244.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
AMD Ryzen 9 5900H
Ryzen 9 5900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302 or Ryzen 9 5900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.