EPYC 9454P vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.44
EPYC 9454P
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 290 Watt
60.35
+539%

EPYC 9454P outperforms EPYC 7301 by a whopping 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking81016
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.999.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.2519.68
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$4,598

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9454P has 381% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier2227.5
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.44
EPYC 9454P 60.35
+539%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
EPYC 9454P 95863
+539%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 60.35
Recency 29 June 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 290 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 70.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9454P, on the other hand, has a 539.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9454P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and EPYC 9454P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
AMD EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 10 votes

Rate EPYC 9454P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or EPYC 9454P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.